| |

|
|
Back
to the BAC
Closed
in 1998 for renovations, the Center for British Art reopened in
January with three shows and a reorganization of the galleries that
left no doubt about the strength of the Center's mission or the
energy of its new director.
April
1999
by Bruce Fellman
"I
sense light as the giver of all presences," said the late architect
Louis
I. Kahn, and
his last creation -- the Yale
Center for British Art -- was certainly the embodiment of illumination.
But two decades of New England weather had dulled the landmark 1977
structure, which was designed to house the collection of British
masterworks given to the University by the late Paul
Mellon '29. The "ambience of inspiration" that Kahn
had sought to create had become somewhat less inspirational.
The roof and the 56
glazed light monitors that created the center's special ambience
were leaking, the heating and cooling systems were wearing out,
and the passage of thousands of visitors through the building had
taken a toll on the interior. So early in 1998, after an assortment
of architects and construction experts, and Mellon (whose philanthropy
funded the building and provided an endowment for its ongoing work
as both a museum and a resource for teaching and scholarship) agreed
on a comprehensive renovation plan, the Center closed its doors
to the public, and sent many of its paintings on a world tour. Thus
began the $4.3-million renovation that Patrick
McCaughey, who succeeded Duncan Robinson as director in 1996,
dubbed "the year of the roof."
| |
"Louis
Kahn would have been both happy and unhappy with the renovation."
|
McCaughey might well
have added, "of the walls and the carpet" -- and of the
reconfiguration of the collection. For when the Center reopened
this past winter with a gala celebration on January 22, the 1,600-plus
visitors who packed into the building were treated not only to exhibitions
of art by Henry
Moore, Lucian
Freud, and Francis
Bacon, but were also able to sample, for the first time, a renewed
BAC. (Paul Mellon was too ill to be among them; he died, at age
91, on February 1.)
"Louis Kahn would
have been both happy and unhappy with the renovation," says
Jules
Prown, the Paul Mellon Professor of the History of Art, who
worked with the architect when the building was being designed in
the early 1970s. "Kahn would have been pleased with the work,
which does honor to the structure, but he would have been very disappointed
that the roof and the windows, which were replaced in 1996, didn't
hold up."
Part
of the reason problems developed relatively soon had to do with
"short cuts" that were taken to reduce the building's
construction costs,
Prown maintains. There were also "inherent flaws" in the
design that increased vulnerability to the climate, as well as a
lengthy period of poor maintenance.
The result was a major
project that was coordinated by the Turner
Construction Company, a Connecticut-based contractor that had
handled the window-replacement project at the BAC, as well as many
other renovations at Yale, including those currently underway at
the Law School. Turner, along with Yale facilities architect Larry
Regan and consulting engineers Wiss,
Janney, and Elstner Associates, of Chicago, worked with The
Eagle
Group, of West Hartford, to replace the roof, and with the George
Ellis Company, to replace the worn-out coils in the air-conditioning
units.
While the outside of
the BAC was wrapped in scaffolding and teams of workers put in six-day-weeks
for nine months, officials turned their attention to the building's
interior, which was, says David Mills, the Center's associate director,
"in need of a major facelift." But there's a "Kahn
look," Mills continues, so "when you edit, you have to
make it appear as if nothing's been rewritten."
| |
"Buildings
are living things that constantly need care, and certain
parts wear out on a natural cycle."
|
Architect Glenn Gregg
'67MArch, of Gregg and Wies Architects of New Haven, was hired to
shepherd the inside work. "Our involvement started with the
linen," says Gregg, whose company has handled interior restorations
of the Beinecke Rare Book and Manuscript Library and the Law School
auditorium.
A hallmark
of a Kahn structure is its celebration of unadorned surfaces:
white oak and matte stainless steel panels; concrete walls, beams,
and pillars; brushed aluminum ductwork. Much of the artwork was
hung on movable wall panels that were faced with a special kind
of linen whose weave permitted easy repair when paintings were moved.
But with the artwork either abroad or packed away, it became apparent
that the walls themselves were in bad shape. "Buildings are
living things that constantly need care, and certain parts wear
out on a natural cycle," says Gregg.
The particle-board walls
had outlived their usefulness, and the linen needed to be replaced.
But while making new walls that would prevent moisture infiltration
-- a recurrent problem -- proved relatively easy, finding suitable
fabric turned out to be an adventure. "When we contacted the
Belgian firm that had woven the original material, we learned that
the only loom that could do the job hadn't been used in ten years,"
Gregg says. "However, we were assured that the company could
get it running again and find the craftsmen to operate it."
This optimism proved
misplaced, but with time beginning to run out, Gregg located a company
in Holland that could bring a similar loom back to life. In early
November, more than 4,000 yards of "two-over-one-warp"
linen arrived in New Haven. "We were very relieved," says
Gregg. "Had it not worked, we would have been out of options."
While the new material
was being stretched into place on the display walls and exhibition
panels, David Mills wondered what to do with the old fabric -- some
3,500 yards of it. A curator, noticing that James
McNeil Whistler had painted his Nocturne
in Blue and Silver on what appeared to be a similar "canvas,"
suggested that perhaps the School of Art could use it. The material,
once primed with gesso, proved a perfect surface. "For at least
the next ten years, Yale's art students will be painting on our
dirty linen," says Mills.
At the same time Gregg
and his colleagues were combing Europe for weavers, they were looking
for a company that could replace the BAC's worn-out carpeting. The
original, in keeping with Kahn's predilection for the natural, was
made of wool, but Center conservators adamantly opposed using a
similar material for the replacement. Not only can wool harbor artwork-attacking
insects, but the fibers give off minute amounts of a sulphurous
gas that can destroy the white pigment in paint.
Gregg needed a suitable
synthetic with the look and feel of the muted gray-brown carpet
that had been underfoot for 21 years, and after he found something
that passed muster with the conservators, he nervously ordered it
installed. "You want to leave the place without fingerprints,"
he explained. He was nonetheless worried that the use of synthetics
in a Kahn building constituted a sacrilege.
But Gregg needn't have
been concerned, says Prown. "Synthetics are a product of human
intelligence, so I don't think Kahn would have reacted adversely
to the new carpet."
The architect
might have been a bit miffed over changes made to the Founder's
Room, a private
meeting place on the fourth floor. In reworking the space to reflect
Paul Mellon's tastes, designer Bruce Budd contravened a central
Kahn proscription by having the room side of the main door painted
to look like mahogany.
| |
Workers
even left in place the curious inscription, "For Joe,"
that Mellon had asked to be painted on the travertine of
the first floor.
|
The door aside, critics
and BAC officials alike believe that the changes inside and out
would have been accepted by both architect and patron. (Mellon was
kept informed of the progress of the renovation through a series
of reports and photographs.) In fact, with the exception of a new
desk in the front courtyard, most of the renovations are invisible.
Workers even left in place the curious inscription, "For Joe,"
that Mellon had asked to be painted on the travertine of the first
floor.
"Joe was a bartender
at a tavern on this spot," says Mills, noting that the establishment,
which Mellon apparently frequented when he was a Yale undergraduate,
must have made quite an impression on the young man to have caused
him to grant the innkeeper a kind of immortality.
As the work progressed,
director McCaughey and his staff focused on the artwork, and how
it would be reinstalled on the fourth floor, the home of the permanent
collection. The Mellon collection of British art, the largest outside
of Britain, "offers Americans a whole new vision of what British
art is all about," says McCaughey. "It's not just full-length
portraits of well-dressed gentlemen. Rather, it's a complicated
story rich with themes."
But instead of following
a thematic approach, the collection had been originally hung in
accordance with what Malcolm Warner, curator of paintings and sculpture,
called the "great man theory of art history." In chronological
order, the viewer would be led from one major artist to another.
The works of Gainsborough
would all be together, as would those of Turner,
and so forth.
"But over time,
there'd been an opportunity to tinker, and then, to tinker with
the tinkering," Warner notes. "As a result, the collection
began to suffer from what always happens: the tendency to drift
away from the original vision."
Turning
back the clock, however, was not considered an option.
In recent years, says Warner, ways of seeing art have changed, and
this change in viewpoint offered a rare opportunity. "We could
start with a clean slate and present the collection in a new way."
Warner and Julia Marciari
Alexander '94MPhil, assistant curator of paintings and sculpture,
began looking through the storerooms -- "talent-spotting,"
they termed it -- to familiarize themselves with every one of the
1,600-plus paintings in the BAC. The artwork had already been recorded
in digital form, which meant that the curators, with the help of
a three-dimensional computer program put together by Glenn Gregg,
could "rehang" the collection and move around the walls
without any heavy lifting. (This is a task not to be minimized;
a masterpiece like George
Stubbs's Horse
Attacked by a Lion weighs approximately 500 pounds.)
To organize the art
into coherent themes, the curators first employed a method that
was surprisingly low-tech. "Every painting on our 'A' list -- there
were about 500 -- was reduced in size and glued onto cardboard,"
says Warner. With piles of these art cards (each about the size
of a photographic slide) in hand, the curators and McCaughey began
regular meetings in what quickly became known as the "war room"
to map strategy.
"We tried lots
of experiments that didn't work," notes Warner. For while the
collection is rich and varied, it is not equally deep in all areas,
and so the planners quickly realized that there was not enough material
to permit an adequate exploration of, say, the still life. Then
there was the "dinner party" effect. "Even when you
have what looks like a perfect guest list, you can't guarantee that
everyone will hit it off," says Warner. "Sometimes, it
was the images that didn't look good together; sometimes, it was
their frames."
| |
"Art
is all about the pleasure of looking at an object, but at
times, it's also helpful to know something about the painter
and the period."
|
Eventually, however,
the director and the curators were able to develop 32 themes that
take the viewer from the time of Henry VIII in the 1500s to the
turn of this century. Included among the themes are the idealized
landscape, conversation pieces, the Grand Tour, the pleasures of
the city, night pieces, the visionary in art, the romantic traveler,
and, given Paul Mellon's love of outdoor pursuits, the sporting
life. There are also thematic looks at the art of J.M.W. Turner
and John
Constable, and because their paintings are next to one another,
viewers are afforded the opportunity to compare and contrast approaches.
To put
the art in context, Warner and Marciari Alexander wrote labels that
explained each theme. "Art
is all about the pleasure of looking at an object, but at times,
it's also helpful to know something about the painter and the period,"
says Warner, touching on what he terms a "great debate"
among curators. "There are some antediluvian types who feel
that any information actually spoils the experience, but then there
are the zealots who believe that a work of art is incapable of meaning
anything to the viewer without the words of a curator. In keeping
with Mr. Mellon's intentions, we lean toward the educational side
of things."
Of course the BAC, woven
as it is into the intellectual fabric of the University, has always
provided an education for visitors ranging from Yale students to
New Haven schoolchildren to art lovers from around the world. One
offshoot of the renovation, however -- the creation of what's known
as the Long Gallery on the fourth floor -- has served to tie the
Center into the undergraduate curriculum. In addition to being home
to a display of portrait busts, the Long Gallery, which once was
a series of storerooms, is now being used for frequently changing
displays put together by art historians and students to explore
themes different from and, perhaps, more ephemeral than, those on
the nearby walls.
One recent show examined
British imperial expansion through the lens of art; others delved
into marine art and the ways in which Shakespearian theater has
been depicted. More explorations are in the works.
"I was keen to
come here because of the increasing opportunities to teach,"
says Gillian Forrester, assistant curator of prints and drawings.
"It's good for the collections to be used, and we're always
trying to build closer links to the University."
Among those links, says
Forrester, is the possibility of bringing in an artist in residence
to be shared by both the BAC and the recently opened Digital
Media Center for the Arts. "New scholarship is continuously
being brought to bear on the collection," notes the director,
"and this keeps us lively and up-to-date."
Another
thing that ensures that the BAC will remain current is its recent
emphasis on modern British art.
McCaughey, who helped bring to fruition the Moore, Bacon, and Freud
exhibitions that opened the Center in January and has added to the
collection works by such controversial British artists as Damien
Hirst, is clearly committed to continuing the examination of
modern British art. "I'm only building on what Paul Mellon
and Duncan Robinson started when they decided to feature such 20th
century artists as Ben
Nicholson and Barbara
Hepworth," McCaughey says.
Many of the shows planned
for the second and third floor will deal with current material.
This month, for example, Gillian Forrester premieres an exhibition
titled "Graphic! British Prints Now," and at the same
time, the BAC unveils a recent purchase of Untitled
(Ten Tables), a sculpture by Rachel
Whiteread that the artist calls "rather blank and unforgiving"
that "contains all sorts of unanswered questions."
Questioning, of course,
is precisely what artists -- and, by extension, art museums -- are supposed
to do. "People have seen the BAC as a respite, and they come
in expecting to be soothed," says Scott Wilcox, curator of
prints, drawings, and rare books. "But we don't want to be
a tranquilizer."
Without a doubt, there's
a tranquil quality to the renovated building, with its modulated
natural light, soft colors, and, thanks to the reconfiguration of
the walls, longer vistas. But the house that Mellon built is not,
by design, an antiquarian shrine. "We want to show the continuity
of British art," says McCaughey. "This is an ongoing story."
|
|