| |
|
|
Failures
to Communicate
The
immune system is the body's primary defense against viruses, bacteria,
and other would-be invaders. In learning the secrets of immunity
Yale researchers are discovering the truth of a military axiom:
victory depends on good communications.
April
1997
by Bruce Fellman
In 1917
a physician in his 40s named Theodore Janeway, Class of 1892, was
enlisted by the military to help solve a medical mystery.
The doughboys-in-training, while they were still in the United States,
were coming down with a devastating illness and fighting their battles -- sometimes,
their last battles -- in hospital beds rather than in the trenches
of Europe. This enemy, Dr. Janeway would learn during an abbreviated
investigation, was far older than bullets, bayonets, and poison
gas -- and just as deadly. "My grandfather got sick and died -- rapidly -- of
ordinary pneumonia," says Charles Janeway Jr., a Yale physician
and a member of a team of scientists who study the immune system,
the body's defense against bacteria, viruses, and other invaders.
Janeway's father Charles
'30 was a pioneer in this field, and because of his research and
that of many others, doctors now have a formidable array of medicines
to help the system do its job. Using techniques at the forefront
of science, including some similar to those which led to the recent
cloning in Scotland of the sheep known as Dolly, Janeway and fellow
Yale investigators are attempting to take the next step: improving
the sophisticated system that evolved to protect people from infection.
"We at last have
most of the tools we need to learn how the system works when things
are going right or wrong," says Richard Flavell, a molecular
biologist who chairs the Medical School's section of immunobiology,
an interdisciplinary group of 15 professors whose faculty appointments
range from the biology department to the School of Epidemiology
and Public Health. "Our hope is that basic immunology research
will in time enable us to practice truly preventative medicine."
Out of studies underway
at Yale may come new drugs and therapies that can be used to fight
a host of dreaded diseases, among them AIDS, cancer, multiple sclerosis,
diabetes, lupus, and rheumatoid arthritis. Understanding the details
of the immunity is also critical to the development of vaccines,
such as those that now prevent illnesses like smallpox and polio
from ever establishing a beachhead in the human body, and could
soon protect us against Lyme disease. There is even hope that it
will soon be possible to regulate the immune response, turning it
up (in the case of AIDS) or toning it down (in MS and other autoimmune-type
ailments in which the system goes awry and attacks parts of the
body) to fit the situation. And while no one envisions flocks of
cloned sheep grazing on the Cross Campus, researchers here are working
with the Alexion Corporation, a local biotechnology company, to
develop genetically engineered pigs whose organs might be transplanted
into humans without being rejected by the immune system.
Research
in this high-tech field is moving so rapidly that Janeway's definitive
text, Immunobiology:
The Immune System in Health and Disease (Garland Publishing),
cowritten with London University scientist Paul Travers, has to
be revised and reissued every 18 months in order to remain current.
Yale scientists are among those most responsible for pushing the
pace of discovery, and the unusually comprehensive nature of the
investigations underway here means that every part of the process
is being watched.
Much of the latest work
is centered on the white blood cells known as lymphocytes. These
get their name from their primary address -- the body's lymph nodes -- and
they come in two general varieties -- T-cells and B-cells -- each of which
is designed to accomplish a different job. For example, when microbes
attempt to invade, T-cells, so called because they mature in the
thymus (an organ near the throat), can, to repeat the military analogy,
be the foot soldiers and engage in hand-to-hand fighting, or they
can be called upon to serve as what researchers term "helpers."
In this role, they might aid a cellular vacuum cleaner known as
a macrophage by turning on its killing machinery, or they can help
guide the artillery of the immune system, the B-cells (these mature
in the bone marrow), which fire long-range weapons known as antibodies.
These large molecules recognize only one, very specific kind of
invader -- or antigen, to use the technical term. Should the antibody
fit the antigen, a chain of events is initiated that results in
the invader's defeat. The attack is rebuffed, calm is restored,
and because the immune system "remembers" the identities
of any microbes which put it to the test, the next time that antigen
arrives the skirmish may be put down without the person whose body
serves as a battlefield ever being aware of the combat.
At least, this is how
human evolution would like the battle to unfold. But viruses and
bacteria are constantly evolving as well, and the result is a cellular
arms race. Each side tries to outdo the other, and because the defensive
"hardware" sooner or later fails to perform its job, people
get sick and die.
Immunobiologists are
in business to improve the odds that govern human survival, says
Flavell, who has been instrumental in developing one of the key
tools of the immunobiology trade: a mouse in which a tiny but crucial
bit of the genetic program has been eliminated. Flavell explains
that researchers -- in part because of the pioneering work of Sterling
Professor of Biology Frank Ruddle -- had learned in the 1970s
and 1980s how to add genes, and abilities, to mice. These so-called
transgenic animals are now a standard part of the scientific arsenal,
but in the mid-1980s, investigators learned a new trick: how to
"knock out" precisely targeted genes. To researchers studying
the gene-directed components of the immune system, "these 'loss
of function mutants' have been a real breakthrough," says Flavell.
The investigator
and his colleagues have created more than 20 different kinds of
"knockout mice,"
including one whose immune system cells have lost the ability to
talk with one another. Normally, communication takes place when
a molecule called CD40 -- "Everything we study has a romantic
name," Flavell says apologetically -- that sits on the cell's
surface links, lock and key fashion, to a molecule known as the
CD40 ligand on another cell. A similar kind of chemical chat pattern
occurs in many of the interactions taking place in the immune system,
and the result is that T-cells, B-cells, and macrophages are turned
on and sent to work. However, mice in which the genes required to
make CD40 ligand were knocked out could not activate the troops -- and
neither can people born lacking the genes. "Without the conversation,
nothing happens," says Flavell. "It's a very serious defect."
Communications failures
also figure in the work of Kim Bottomly, professor of immunobiology,
who studies a situation in which helper T-cells wind up choosing
the wrong vocation. "We're trying to understand how they know
what to do," says Bottomly, adding that, like the narrator
in the Robert Frost poem "The Road Not Taken," the choice
"makes all the difference" -- often, between life and death.
Helper T-cells have
essentially two job pathways. They can serve as aides de camp to
members of the defense forces (often, these are macrophages) that
battle bacteria and fungi living inside of cells -- a hallmark of pneumonia
and leprosy -- or they can join forces with B-cells to fight against
pathogens that are doing damage on the cellular exterior. "Once
the cells decide, they're committed to the response, and because
they make memory cells, you're stuck with the choice," says
Bottomly.
Working with transgenic
mice, the scientist has learned that the crucial decision is based
on chemical signals that come from both inside and outside cells.
To explain how the helper T-cell gets the message, Bottomly cites
the case of leprosy, a disease in which bacteria specialize in making
a living inside the macrophages that have ingested them. The pathogens
may be hidden from view, but they are not invisible, for within
every cell is a molecule called MHC, and when infection occurs,
it's MHC's job to take pieces of the pathogen and display them to
the outside world.
"The surface of
the macrophage becomes a bulletin board that says, 'Help, I'm infected,'"
says Bottomly. If all goes according to plan, a helper T-cell that
carries the one receptor capable of reading the message will, in
the nick of time, pass through the neighborhood, see the note, and
help the macrophage turn on its killing machinery.
On the other hand, the
immune system responds to invading organisms that perform outside
jobs with a different set of chemical signals. When the helpers
read these, they put out a distress call to the B-cells.
A misreading
can mean trouble.
Bottomly explains that people who have the worst form of leprosy
"make a very powerful immune response to the disease -- but it's
not the right one." Many allergies also look like cases in
which the helper T-cells have gotten the wrong message and chosen
the wrong career. Change, however, is possible, and the researcher
suspects that allergy shots, in which small amounts of problematic
substances are regularly injected into allergy sufferers, are an
example of how a malfunctioning system can be retrained.
"Unless you live
in a sterile bubble, you can't stop pathogens from coming into your
body," says Bottomly, "so we need to learn how to deal
with the negative aspects of the immune system and figure out how
to switch inappropriate responses."
One of the most inappropriate
is found in arthritis, diabetes, multiple sclerosis, lupus, and
other autoimmune diseases in which immune cells attack the body's
own tissue. "An immune system is clearly valuable, but it's
also potentially dangerous because it can turn on itself,"
says Charles Janeway, who is studying the natural history of MS,
a paralyzing and eventually fatal condition in which T-cells treat
the protein that surrounds nerves as if it were a hostile invader.
Janeway explains that
one of the most surprising discoveries about autoimmune diseases
has come from basic research into the generation of the T- and B-cell
receptors that must recognize every imaginable antigen the body
might encounter over a lifetime. The requisite diversity is truly
mind-boggling -- one estimate places the number of possible receptors
at one followed by 18 zeroes! -- and because the manufacturing process
operates entirely at random, there is plenty of opportunity to create
cells that will react against components of the very body they're
supposed to protect.
Much of this potential
havoc is averted, however, because of a winnowing process that takes
place early in human development. In essence, every freshly minted
cell looks at itself in the mirror. If the reflection it sees looks
familiar -- an indication that it will react to self-tissue as if it
were foreign -- the cell commits suicide right on the spot.
Until recently, scientists
believed that this process eliminated self-reactive cells in all
but a small percentage of the population who were unlucky enough
to be born with a system that somehow went awry. However, it turns
out that not only do we make autoreactive T- and B-cells all the
time, we also fail to delete a significant number of them. "We're
all carrying around the seeds of our own destruction," says
Janeway, "but ordinarily, these cells are held in check."
While no one has identified
the "brake" in humans, the scientist has come up with
a candidate substance in mice. "If we get rid of it by gene
knockout, all hell breaks loose," he says.
In autoimmune
disease, that hell can be a long time in coming.
For example, lupus, which primarily affects women, often doesn't
begin in earnest until a person reaches 35. But long before the
ailment causes cells to glow a fluorescent green when they're exposed
to a diagnostic procedure, a cascade of events that will eventually
prove devastating has already begun. Rheumatologist Mark Mamula,
assistant professor of medicine, is trying to figure out where the
process starts.
While a true autoimmune
disease occurs only when the system turns its firepower on a wide
variety of self-antigens, Mamula has shown that the trouble can,
given both time and the right circumstances, begin with one "humble"
mistake. The scientist explains that the autoimmune cascade might
start when a mistakenly self-reactive T-cell seeks out a B-cell
partner and calls it to arms. Both activated cells then make copies
of themselves, and the B-cells, in addition to cranking out antibodies,
start doing something else -- something critical.
B-cells are highly adept
at vacuuming up specific kinds of antigen, notes Mamula. Often,
however, antigens travel in mixed company, and like a group of spies
armed with a secret password, if one is granted access the rest
come along for the ride. Inside the B-cell all these antigens are
rendered down to their molecular parts, which are then displayed
on the cellular bulletin board. A diverse group of helper T-cells
arrive and read the messages for aid, and these troops, in turn,
activate a diversity of B-cells. The result is an all-out assault
on many components of a person's tissue.
Eventually, the battle
will wane, but because the immune system is making memory cells -- in
effect, remembering something that would be better left forgotten -- there
will be new skirmishes, each of which results in more damage: the
nerves in MS, the ability to make insulin in diabetes, the joints
in arthritis, many tissues in lupus.
"By the time we
see a patient, the trigger has already been pulled," says Mamula,
"so what we're wondering is: can we catch this immune response
early and short-circuit it?"
The brief answer is
"not yet," but I. Nicholas Crispe, associate professor
of immunobiology, is optimistic that the day is not far off when
immune system research will provide physicians with the ability
to fine-tune the system. "It's a matter of tilting the balance,"
says Crispe, "and we may not have to tilt it very much."
Crispe studies an imbalance
in a fundamental process known as programmed cell death, the method
nature has invented to end an immune response. The scientist explains
that instead of calmly reverting to civilian life when the invading
microbes have been subdued, "the activated T-cells commit what
we call fratricide -- they kill each other. They don't go quietly."
Sometimes
they don't go at all, and when that happens, there's trouble, particularly
when the hangers-on belong to a class of specialists known as killer
T-cells. These are called into action to handle virus infections,
a situation that results in a killer T-cell causing the demise of
its infected counterpart. (The problem in AIDS is that the killer
T-cells destroy the helper T-cells, which are infected with HIV,
and ultimately disable the immune system.)
"Killer T-cells
can be very dangerous," Crispe notes. "If they're out
of control, there can be lots of 'bystander killing.'"
Such a state of affairs
may trigger autoimmune diseases, and it may also result in a fatal
but thankfully rare syndrome in humans in which the lymph nodes
fill up with well-armed killer T-cells that have never been told
the battle's over. To prevent such situations, the body has evolved
a special method for dealing with these cells. Not only do they
meet their ends through conventional means, but Crispe's research
has shown that when their work is through, "activated killer
T-cells migrate to specific destruction sites in the liver. This
organ is the 'elephant's graveyard' of the immune system."
Crispe speculates that
many tumors set up shop in the liver because it's the one place
killer T-cells can't go without being killed themselves, and he
suspects that the organ's skill in squelching immune responses is
the reason that liver transplants don't require the massive amounts
of drugs which are normally needed to prevent rejection of hearts,
lungs, kidneys, and the like. To be sure, such boons as rejection-free
organs and the ability to selectively increase the lifespan of killer
T-cells -- a situation that might result in more people being able
to purge the virus that causes AIDS from their bodies -- are currently
in the realm of science fiction, says Crispe.
But a host of medical
miracles, among them the antibiotics that mostly likely would have
prevented Theodore Janeway's untimely death 80 years ago, were once
in the same realm. The new discoveries that are being revealed every
day are the foundation of the next generation of miracles.
|
|