| |
Lewis
Lapham majored in English and was a member of the Pundits. He is
the editor of Harper's
Magazine and the author of five books, most recently Hotel
America.
|
|
The
Yale of My Day:
Defying Dink
by
Lewis Lapham '56
March 1997
Most
of what I learned at Yale I learned outside its classrooms,
and my four years as an undergraduate I remember as one, long, wayward
conversation in the only all-night restaurant on Chapel Street.
The topics under discussion -- God, man, existence, Alfred
Prufrock's peach -- were borrowed from the same anthology of
large abstraction that supplied the texts for English 10 or Philosophy
116, but at 3 a.m. in the brightly-lit booths of the United Restaurant
the review of the material seemed somehow closer in tone to what
was being said in Greenwich Village than to the mimeographed course
outlines placed on the desks of Linsly-Chittenden by the academic
hirelings of the American Rome.
The waiters didn't speak
much English, but they could be cajoled into silencing the juke
box likely to play "Hey There" or "Stranger in Paradise,"
and so permit anybody who showed up late for 10-cent coffee and
a 40-cent hamburger to proceed, without frivolous interruption,
to the search for the ineffable and the work of intellectual revolt.
The dramatis personae changed from week to week, but the company
invariably added to the sum of its quixotic hopes and miscellaneous
discontents -- apprentice poets and would-be novelists, a trumpet
player in one of the Yale jazz bands badly unnerved by his sexual
encounter (two days in the Hotel Duncan) with Sarah Vaughn, authors
of plays in one scene, aggrieved Jews resentful of their status
as designated proofs of Christian tolerance, a student of Russian
literature (suspected of Communism and arrested by the F.B.I. for
possession of a Thompson submachine gun), admirers of Albert Camus
and Bertolt Brecht, angry young English professors chafing under
the rules of academic tenure,
an actress from the Drama School who said she had been to bed with
Brando. All present delighted in their defiance of anything and
everything that would be identified with Dink Stover or Henry Luce,
and none of us had very far to look for the objects of derision
on which to chalk up the proofs of our loyalty to a higher truth
and a nobler purpose.
Yale
in the autumn of 1952, the
Yale of the neo-Gothic quadrangles and the Whiffenpoof
song, continued the lessons in conduct and deportment begun
at New England boarding schools -- larger in its ambitions than
Andover or Hotchkiss, and not as strict in its rules about drinking
the soup or turning off the lights, but otherwise an elaboration
of more or less the same sermon in Protestant stone. A gentleman's
college where the sons of the American haute bourgeoisie were sent
in station wagons to improve their acquaintance with the civilization
(here is London, there is Paris) in which they would have occasion
to be spending a great deal of money. Words were meant to be seen,
not heard, but it was a matter of good form (like knowing how to
dance the waltz or play a five-iron shot out of wet sand) to appreciate
the distinctions between the Black Death, the Battle of Trafalgar,
and a logarithm table.
To take seriously the
precepts of so complacent an institution was to commit the crime
of philistinism and trade one's soul for the standard mess of Wall
Street pottage.
The line of underground
resistance revealed itself in principled objection to Harris tweed
and the football team, to teas at President Griswold's house, the
Yale Daily News (steadfast in its support of Lester Lanin
and Senator Joseph McCarthy), the Fence Club,
J. Press (where prescuffed white buckskin shoes sold for $10
more than the same shoes new in the box), weekends at Vassar or
Smith, Battell Chapel, the C.I.A. (which maintained recruiting offices
in both the History and the English departments), button-down shirts,
captains' chairs, and Scholars of the House.
It was to New York City
instead of Sterling Library that the novice Yale intelligentsia
went in search of exemplary texts, and I remember numerous journeys
south on slow trains to see performances of The Crucible
and Waiting for Godot or listen to W.H. Auden distinguish
poetry from prose in an apartment near Washington Square, to follow
Thelonius Monk's wanderings through the key of C-sharp minor and
watch Dylan Thomas drink himself to death at the White Horse Tavern
on Hudson Street.
By comparison
with the excitements of Greenwich Village and the energy of the
all-night seminars on Chapel Street, much of the classroom seemed
timid or bland.
I came across a few splendid teachers, most notably Alexander Witherspoon,
who taught Milton's Paradise
Lost with the proviso that all present take note of the
proposition that "education is a self-inflicted wound."
But as a classroom proposition Yale was largely a matter of filling
out forms, and most of the faculty accepted the terms of their service
with graceful irony, content to apply the veneers of cultural polish
to the expensive furniture temporarily on loan from Fairfield County
or the shores of Long Island Sound. Over a term of four years the
representative celebrities of the human soul (among them Plato,
Hamlet, Thomas Jefferson, and Tiny Tim) put in guest appearances
on the academic talk show and were welcomed with rounds of polite
applause. The students who received the better marks were those
who could think of the most flattering explanations for the greatness
of the great figures and the great truths.
By the winter of junior
year I had pretty much stopped going to class. Excited by almost
any book that fell into my hands (books about medieval riverine
fortifications, books about Talleyrand's mistresses and Kaiser Wilhelm's
uniforms, books about bees), I also had encountered the exuberant
presence of Charles Garside, a teaching assistant in the history
department, who prompted me to write term papers in imitation of
Ezra Pound's Cantos. Garside's delight in the play of ideas was
a wonder to behold, but he was not a man to look lightly upon the
sins of scholarly compromise. Late one night in the United Restaurant
I carelessly allowed him to read an essay about John Donne that
I had written earlier in the evening and of which I was presumptuously
fond. "Surely," he said, "you can do better than
this," and so saying, with a theatrical gesture suited to the
staging of a play by Moliere, he tore the manuscript into small
and irretrievable pieces.
The paper was due to
be handed in the next morning at 10 a.m. to a course in 17th-century
poetry taught by a professor who didn't like surprises. But Garside
was a brilliant lecturer, and as usual I was captured by his baroque
enthusiasm and his command of almost any subject that came to mind.
We talked about Donne for an hour, with the result that I redrafted
the paper along a line of argument that hadn't been discussed in
class. The professor awarded it the numerical equivalent of an F
and took the trouble to add an irritated marginal note: "I'm
not interested in what you think about Donne. I want to know that
you know what I think about Donne."
The comment defined
the thesis of the standard Yale education in the spring of 1956,
and at the time I thought the professor a sheep-witted pedant. Not
until many years later did I understand that it was Yale's implacable
smugness that goaded me into the pain of thought and the love of
words. Presumably that was the point. In full view of Harkness Tower,
together with its superb collection of striped and polka-dot ties,
the College left carelessly lying around under the elm trees a large
assortment of sharp and blunt instruments, all or any one of which,
unless handled with extreme care, was apt to inflict a life-long
wound.
|
|