| |
|
|
Collecting
from the Heart
For
more than half a century, Richard Brown Baker '35 has been amassing
modern art with an unfailing eye for quality. Now that he plans
to donate most of his trove to the Art Gallery, some of the best
work from Dubuffet to Rauschenberg will be on call for scholars
and visitors alike.
by
Bruce Fellman
October 1995
So noisy
was the battling by educational commentators and political pundits
last spring over Yale's decision
to return Lee Bass's $20 million that news of an even larger donation
to the University went almost unnoticed.
On the occasion of a
show at the University Art Gallery entitled "Collecting with
Richard Brown Baker, from Pollock to Lichtenstein," Yale officials
announced that the collector, a member of the Yale College Class
of 1935, had given 14 paintings and sculptures, most of them on
display and valued by Sotheby's at roughly $25 million, to Yale.
The gift includes major works by Jackson Pollock, Hans Hofmann,
Roy Lichtenstein, and Robert Motherwell, as well as by Jean Dubuffet,
Robert Rauschenberg, Jasper Johns, James Rosenquist, Willem de Kooning,
Jim Dine, and Cy Twombly. And those are just for openers. Shortly
afterwards, Baker, who began collecting art in 1941, also revealed
his intention to bequeath to Yale at least 1,600 additional paintings,
drawings, sculptures, and other works by such lesser-known artists
as Sue Walls, Steven Assael, Joseph McNamara, and Eric Stotik. Taken
as a whole, the collection might justify a museum of its own, but
by adding it to Yale's already powerful modern holdings, Baker has
raised the Gallery to new heights.
"Richard Brown
Baker has sought, and sought, and sought with the most wonderful
eye, and he's put together an extraordinary collection," says
Sotheby's director of contemporary paintings Robert E. Monk, who
appraised the artwork. Theodore E. Stebbins Jr., curator of American
paintings at the Museum of Fine Arts in Boston and a former curator
at the Yale Gallery, concurs. "This would be a great acquisition
for any museum in the country," says Stebbins. "It's a
unique capsule history of contemporary art."
But Baker's collection
also contains abundant material whose significance has yet to be
determined, and it is those works, says Stebbins, that may make
the bequest even more valuable. "Tastes are always changing,
and art that is considered minor now may be major in the future,"
he says. As an example, he cites the rusted steel sculptures of
Richard Stankiewicz, which were done in the 1950s and are well-represented
among Baker's holdings. Based on Baker's record of picking winners,
Stankiewicz is very likely to have his day.
Perhaps the best proof
of the collector's past prescience is Jackson Pollock's Number
13A, 1948. In 1955, when Baker purchased Arabesque, as
the kinetic painting is popularly known, the artist's reputation
was anything but secure. Once the brightest star on the New York
art scene, which was then the heart of the artistic universe, Pollock
was being nudged off center stage by Willem de Kooning. Baker was
not swayed. "The moment I saw it [Arabesque], I was
enchanted," he wrote in the diary he has kept since he was
a teenager. "I am quick to make up my mind about pictures and
rarely reverse my judgment. It seemed to me an unquestioned opportunity
and I took it."
Damn
the critics, full speed ahead.
The painting, which
he bought for $2,500, would now fetch, experts estimate, in excess
of $8 million on the open market. The Pollock is only the most dramatic
example of Baker's shot-calling. Years ago, he bought a number of
Roy Lichtenstein prints for $5 each, and purchased Lichtenstein's
Blam!, which is now considered a major work by the artist,
for $1,000. Baker bought a Jim Dine painting for $31.66, and a Motherwell
for $800. An Alexander Calder sculpture he purchased for $1,600
is now worth an estimated $250,000, and the Franz Kline painting
called Wanamaker Block that cost the collector $2,000 in
1956 has an estimated value of $3 million today. But artistic, rather
than financial, gain has always been Baker's goal. "I've never
sold anything," he says. "I pride myself on not making
a profit on art." Explaining the fact that he has assembled
his riches without the help of great family wealth, he says, simply:
"I buy at the bottom of the market, and I collect work by contemporary
artists who are not very well established."
According to Susan Vogel,
who became director of the Yale Art Gallery last spring after serving
as the founding director of Manhattan's Museum for African Art,
"It's not that great wealth can't produce great collections.
Obviously, it can. But the best collections I have known were not
formed with fortunes. They have come from people obsessed with art
who collect out of sheer passion; Richard is the exemplar of the
collector." That view is shared by Carol Craven, director of
the Tatistcheff Gallery in New York City, who has had extensive
dealings with Baker over the years. Collectors "love the pursuit,
and when they fall in love with an artist's work, they are almost
insatiable," Craven says. "They really enjoy 'living'
with artists by having the work in their homes, and they love to
watch artistic growth and development."
Vogel is quick to distinguish
the activities of Baker and others who have given works of art to
the Gallery from mere hoarding and accumulating. "For starters,
collecting is systematic," she explains. "It has a clear
sense of what part of the terrain it's going to cover."
In a 1955 journal entry,
Baker described the territory he planned to explore. "I decided
that I would henceforth concentrate on the new post-war art, the
art created since 1945, because I shared [the] view that it was
more exciting, helpful, and challenging to buy the work of the living,
the young, the unestablished," he wrote. "I decided to
ignore the artists (for price reasons) whose reputations had been
achieved in pre-war years."
In the
beginning, Baker gravitated toward the American abstract expressionists
who were showing their work in New York,
and he kept a careful and systematic record of everything he bought,
starting with accession number 1.1941.1, an Adolf Dehn watercolor
that cost him $150. (The most recent entry, 1633.1995.11, is a realistic
Bill Vuksanovich colored pencil drawing called Young Boy in Jeans
and Sweatshirt, for which the collector paid more than $7,000.)
Early on, says Vogel,
Baker also displayed another key characteristic of his discipline.
"A real collector, unlike a hoarder, makes the collection public.
Richard has done this from the beginning, constantly inviting people
back to the apartment to look at what he's collected and lending
to exhibitions across the country."
By donating his works
to Yale, Baker has, according to Vogel, both fulfilled his own intentions
and joined a tradition of contributing to what she describes as
"a collection of collections." The tradition began in
1832 with the opening of the Trumbull Gallery, which was formed
around a collection of paintings from John Trumbull, a distinguished
artist whose most famous work is The Declaration of Independence.
The holdings were enlarged considerably when James Jackson Jarves
added his collection of Italian art to the Gallery in 1871, and
throughout the 20th century, the institution-while making an occasional
purchase on its own-has relied ever more heavily on the generosity
of collectors. One of the most notable additions arrived in 1941
when Katherine S. Dreier gave Yale the Societe Anonyme
Collection, a veritable treasure trove of early 20th-century modern
art. Vogel considers the Baker collection to be a continuation of
the Dreier "time line," giving students and scholars alike
access to holdings that now run the entire gamut of this century's
artistic output.
According to Baker,
collecting came naturally. "I consider it an inherited quality,"
he says. "It definitely runs in the family."
Indeed, his father gathered
up azaleas and Swedish china. His sister and his great aunts rummaged
back-country New England for antiques. Following in the Baker tradition,
Richard, who grew up in Providence, Rhode Island, began collecting
pennies as a youngster, gradually added dimes, nickels, and quarters
to his purview, and, as a Yale undergraduate, became a serious book
collector. (In addition to art, he also collects stones and Chinese
boxes, and when asked whether a handsome display of figurines in
his apartment represented the core of another collection, he said,
"I suppose it does.")
Surprisingly,
perhaps, Baker did not study art or art history while he was at
Yale. Instead,
the self-proclaimed Anglophile majored in English literature, a
love he acquired as a teen when, during a year-long convalescence
for a heart condition, family members took turns reading to him
from Dickens, Scott, Thackeray, Trollope, Boswell, and other masters.
"The classics were poured into me," he says.
The art connection was
probably made when Baker was 16 and, accompanied by his mother,
toured the Louvre in Paris and the National Gallery in London. That
interest was further strengthened at Oxford where, as a Rhodes scholar
studying politics, economics, and philosophy, Baker would dine at
Christ Church College under the watchful eyes of the portraits that
graced the old hall. "A lot of my art background comes simply
from living with good art," Baker explains.
In 1938, he returned
to the United States and worked as a reporter for the Providence
Journal-Bulletin. For $20 a week, Baker wrote fillers and obituaries,
proofread the editorial page, and reported on such mundane events
as school fundraisers for the USO. Small wonder that when an opportunity
arose-even though it meant a salary reduction (to $50 a month)-to
serve as the private secretary to Ambassador Alexander Weddell,
U.S. envoy to Spain, Baker jumped at the chance.
With the Nazis consuming
Europe in 1940, Baker helped American refugees reach safety in Spain.
The experience whetted his appetite for government service and,
exempt from military duty because of his earlier heart problem,
he spent the war years working for the Office of Strategic Services
in Washington, D.C., and in London.
In 1941 on a visit home
to Providence, Baker bought his first work of art, a Dehn watercolor
called Sopris Peak. "It appealed to me, and it wasn't terribly
expensive," he recalls, citing the two threads that have woven
his collection together.
After the war, Baker
settled in Washington, where he served as a research analyst, first
for the State Department and then for the Central Intelligence Agency.
In his spare time, he frequented the Washington galleries and began
amassing a modest collection of paintings.
Through it all, Baker
hoped to turn the events captured in his by-now voluminous journals
(particularly those that covered 1944, "the year of the buzz
bomb" in London) into a novel. With a modest inheritance and
with his father's encouragement, he resigned his CIA post in 1952
and moved to New York City. "I went there to write," he
says, "not to establish myself in the art world. In a sense,
I consider myself a failure in life."
The novel
has yet to be written, but while Baker wrestled with the written
word in the early 1950s, he discovered another career path.
He had done some painting himself and, given his interest in art,
he was naturally drawn to the city's vibrant gallery scene. "It
didn't cost anything to look," he says.
To learn more about
art history, Baker attended lectures at the Museum of Art and the
Art Students' League, and to improve his painting skills, he studied
with Hans Hofmann at the artist's summer studio in Provincetown,
Massachusetts. (Baker rates his own efforts at a "2 out of
100" and confesses that he has not picked up a brush since
1961.) Entranced with the artistic output of his generation, he
began buying their work "before they became household names."
Among the early purchases
was a painting by Franz Kline, which Baker gave to the Gallery last
December, and a Josef Albers, purchased for $25.00 from a wholesale
grocer who ran art shows on the side. "The more I bought, the
more I knew my own taste," he says, "and at some point,
I began to consider myself a genuine collector of post-World War
II art."
With the exception of
the Albers and a handful of work purchased directly from its creators,
the vast majority of Baker's acquisitions have come from galleries.
"There are millions of paintings out there," he says,
"and the best dealers have the ability to select only work
from extremely good artists."
For Baker,
the galleries have served as a kind of artistic filter; respecting
their judgment, he does not attempt to "deal" on price
(the most he has ever paid was $52,000 for George Segal's 1986 sculpture,
Standing Nude with Chair). That characteristic alone would,
no doubt, endear him to art dealers, but according to the Tatistcheff's
Carol Craven, the Richard Brown Baker admiration society is much
more than checkbook deep. "He's a gentleman in the finest old-world
tradition," says Craven, who has worked with Baker for the
last five years and introduced him to the art of Steven Assael,
who is currently high on his list of favorites. "Richard's
totally charming, he has an enormous range of interests, and his
responses to art are always dead-on. He picks the best."
Precisely how he does
it is something of a mystery. Asked during an interview in his New
York apartment what he looked for in a work of art, Baker surveyed
his eclectic holdings-which include a dazzling array of objects,
from Luis Jimenez's fiberglass and epoxy sculpture Cyclist
to Joseph McNamara's ultrarealistic oil painting Boatyard II-and
repeated several times, with increasing heat, "I don't know."
Sotheby's Robert Monk
is not surprised at the collector's inability to pin down the nature
of his vision. Most artists can't do it either, he explains. "Each
thing Baker has collected is brilliant in its own intuitive way,"
says Monk. "There's no common thread." Except, he adds,
Baker's "intuitive perception." It is, he says, a "great
human quality that can be honed by the arts, but one that is almost
impossible to deconstruct."
|
|