yalealumnimagazine.com  
  findings  
spacer spacer spacer
 
rule
  yalealumnimagazine.com
about the Yale Alumni Magazine
classified & display advertising
address changes
The Yale Classifieds
support us
write a letter to the editor

spacer
 
current issue

current issue
issue archives

 

advertise demographics
request a media kit
view The Yale Classifieds
place a classified ad

 

The Yale Alumni Magazine is owned and operated by Yale Alumni Publications, Inc., a nonprofit corporation independent of Yale University.

The content of the magazine and its website is the responsibility of the editors and does not necessarily reflect the views of Yale or its officers.

 

Comment on this article

A Better Cancer Trap

Blood tests for cancer are common. They’re also slow, expensive, and sometimes unreliable.

Tarek Fahmy and Mark Reed think they can change all that with a better mousetrap. Make that a better biomarker trap—part of a new blood test that the two professors hope will become quick, cheap, and accurate enough to perform in a doctor’s office.

Currently, detecting cancer biomarkers—proteins produced in response to a tumor—requires sending blood to a lab. The results take days. To improve on those tests, Fahmy, a chemical engineer, started with existing technology: nanowires, about 1/5,000th of a millimeter wide, that identify biomarkers by detecting electrical current. He teamed with electrical engineer Reed to add the trap, a chip that captures the markers from unpurified blood.

“You wash away all the other stuff,” Fahmy says, then release the biomarkers to the nanowires, which give an electronic readout. Reed, Fahmy, and colleagues published their work online in Nature Nanotechnology. Fahmy predicts the technology could be put in a device the size of an iPod, providing results in 20 minutes for as little as $1 a test.

Cancer testing can be tricky, given controversies like the one over the prostate cancer blood test—which has trouble distinguishing between tumors that need treatment and those better left alone. Could a quicker, cheaper test lead to more such problems?

Fahmy acknowledges the difficulty. “The electronics can be tweaked” to make a test more or less sensitive. But ultimately, he says, it’s up to the medical profession to set standards for testing and treatment.  the end

 
 
 
spacer
 

©1992–2012, Yale Alumni Publications, Inc. All rights reserved.

Yale Alumni Magazine, P.O. Box 1905, New Haven, CT 06509-1905, USA. yam@yale.edu