current issue
issue archives

demographics
request a media kit
view The Yale Classifieds
place a classified ad

The Yale Alumni Magazine is owned and operated by Yale Alumni Publications, Inc., a nonprofit corporation independent of Yale University.

The content of the magazine and its website is the responsibility of the editors and does not necessarily reflect the views of Yale or its officers.

Comment on this article

The daughter effect
July/August 2008
by Cathy Shufro

Legislators with daughters vote more liberally on women’s issues than do their colleagues without daughters. And the more daughters, the more liberal the legislator.

In a recent study of voting patterns in the House of Representatives, Ebonya L. Washington, the Henry Kohn Assistant Professor of Economics, found that the influence of having daughters was most salient in votes on reproductive rights, including laws regulating abortion, international family planning, and access to birth control by teenagers.

Washington expected the results, but with only 435 House members, she wasn’t sure the effect would be large enough to show up in the data. Indeed, there were so few female Representatives that she could not demonstrate that daughters significantly swayed the votes of women in the House—only that daughters affected votes of fathers and of male and female lawmakers in the aggregate.

Having daughters significantly predicted more liberal votes in 12 of 17 areas during the years studied, 1997 to 2004. Aside from reproductive rights, having daughters most strongly influenced votes on issues related to campaigns and elections, labor, and health.

Washington measured the liberality of each U.S. Representative’s voting record using roll call votes and ratings by three advocacy groups, two of them liberal (the National Organization of Women and the American Association of University Women) and one conservative (the National Right to Life Committee).

In broader terms, Washington says her findings suggest the importance of "offspring effects." Research has already shown that peers, colleagues, parents, and siblings shape people’s attitudes and behavior. Her study, published in March in the American Economic Review, shows that children influence parents—though it does not explain how.

In discussing her findings, Washington speculated that although legislator-parents might vote for measures that they thought would minimize the cost of having a daughter, she suspects that the influence is more personal. "I believe, although I have no evidence, that it’s actually through parent-child interaction. To the extent that men participate more in child-rearing, you can imagine that this might be likely to happen.”

She said the study suggests other research into the effects of offspring. She would be curious to know, for instance, whether Vietnam-era lawmakers who voted on the draft were influenced by having sons.

In a real-world example similar to Washington's findings, United States Representative Debbie Wasserman Schultz (D-FL) had an intuition that the offspring effect might help her when she pushed to amend a food-labeling bill two years ago. The amendment preserved the right of states to warn about the dangers of mercury in fish, which can harm children and developing fetuses. Wasserman Schultz prevailed after seeking support from colleagues with children, including a key House Republican, conference chair Adam Putnam. She says Putnam told her that he'd broken ranks to vote with her because his wife was pregnant.

Wasserman Schultz, the mother of two daughters and a son, says, "More and more, I find myself thinking about how the decisions we make are going to reverberate through my children’s lives.”  

Noted

For the quarter ending in March 2008, the Standard & Poor’s Case-Shiller U.S. National Home Price Index plummeted 14.1 percent, the worst drop in its 20-year history. Yale economist Robert Shiller recently extended the index back almost 100 years and discovered that during the Depression, the largest slump in housing prices—in 1932—was only 10.5 percent.

Yale scientists have discovered a new way to rid a brain—at least a mouse’s brain—of amyloid plaques, the hallmark of Alzheimer's. Immunobiologist Richard Flavell and his colleagues genetically engineered mice that would develop the plaques and that had a key immune system pathway blocked. The blockage unleashed cells that attacked and eliminated up to 90 percent of the plaques, and the animals' performance on some memory tests improved. The study appeared online in May in Nature Medicine.

Using changes in wind speed as a proxy for temperature, Yale geologists Steven Sherwood and Robert Allen calculated that the atmospheric temperatures at high altitudes in the tropics have increased by 0.65 degrees C. per decade since 1970. This measurement confirmed a key (but hard-to-prove) prediction of global warming climate models. The work appeared online in Nature Geology in May.

Eubranchipus Holmani  lives! A fingernail-sized fairy shrimp that had not been seen in Connecticut for more than 50 years was rediscovered by Peabody Museum biologist Eric Lazo-Wasem in early May in a temporary pond in Groton. Lazo-Wasem hopes to have the invertebrate placed on the state’s endangered species list.

©1992–2012, Yale Alumni Publications, Inc. All rights reserved.

Yale Alumni Magazine, P.O. Box 1905, New Haven, CT 06509-1905, USA. yam@yale.edu