I came to The Game on a warm November 19 as an amateur anthropologist.
I had been to a few Yale football games as an undergraduate; after my wife Grace and I returned to the New Haven area two years ago, we'd gone to a few more. But this would be my first Harvard-Yale game. In all this time, I've never really understood its mystique. I didn't even know how Grace should dress. Raccoon coat? Jeans? I had no idea. Clearly I was going to have to learn about the culture of The Game from scratch.
In my self-appointed role as an anthropologist, I decided we couldn't just head straight to our seats in the bleachers. Instead, Grace and I hiked along an arc, making our way past an inflatable bulldog that towered over the parking lots like a canine sphinx. We passed the Harvard Club of Fairfield County's tent and other sedate attractions situated near the Yale Bowl. We then crossed the street into Lot D and entered, well, chaos.
Rows of U-Haul trucks, loaded with speakers blasting hip-hop and Guns 'n' Roses, rose above huge crowds. With a new halftime curfew in effect, people seemed to be getting as much alcohol into their systems as quickly as possible. Some were held upside down as they drank beer from kegs. Others drank Bloody Marys at the tailgate set up by School of Public Health students. It looked as if a lot of the people surrounding us had forgotten The Game completely.
By the time we made it to our seats, Yale was leading 7-3 in the second quarter. As I settled in to watch the action, I tried to use The Game as a telescope to look back in evolutionary time. How did our history over the past few million years shape our minds and bodies so that something like football would become such a passion? Primates are intensely social animals, and humans are intensely social primates. Our hominid ancestors formed larger and larger groups, and acquired the mental capacity to cooperate on complicated projects. The players on both teams were working together like a seamless whole, in part because they could understand the intentions of their teammates. Without mind-reading, there would be no football.
When people talk about human evolution, sports usually comes up as an example of how hardwired our behavior is. Some researchers claim that sports are a form of sexual display -- males competing with other males to show observing females how strong and smart they are. But once women were allowed to join team sports, they proved to be able to play fiercely and competitively as well. And certainly when I looked around at the people who had come to The Game, I saw plenty of shouting males, not an unbroken sea of swooning female faces.
A more interesting perspective on The Game comes from Greg Downey, an anthropologist at the University of Notre Dame. He points out that sports such as football put the human body and mind through a remarkable transformation. As athletes train, they rewire their brains and alter the way the genes in their muscle cells work. And while the Harvard and Yale football players resculpt themselves in one way, their counterparts who do gymnastics, long-distance running, swimming, fencing, and other sports are transforming themselves in other directions. Go to other cultures, and you'll find people who have been remodeled for still other kinds of performance -- from Brazilian capoeira dancers to Japanese pearl divers. Rather than showing how hardwired we are, football shows just how malleable our bodies are under the force of culture. And we humans are unique in this regard -- call us Homo athleticus.
As an amateur anthropologist, I was also interested in the people in the stands: the crew-cut boys from West Haven, the young families with babies in slings, the old alums in tweed jackets. A man and a woman emerged from a nearby gate and stopped in front of us. They chatted for a while, their gaze drifting from The Game to the stands and back.
Before long people were yelling, "Down in front!" The offenders didn't hear the complaints at first because of the noise of The Game. That got people angrier. When the couple finally did notice, the two of them sauntered slowly away, trying to look as if they had just decided to move on of their own accord.
"Harvard," a woman near me said. Her voice had the same tone as if she were saying, "Typical."
The amateur anthropologist in me snapped to attention. How did she know the couple was from Harvard? I hadn't noticed any giant H on their coats. I strained to look at them as they walked away. In the woman's hair I could just make out a thin crimson ribbon.
The differences between Harvard and Yale are minuscule when you compare them with the differences between nations, ethnicities, and religions. Yet their rivalry supports a healthy trade in sweatshirts, scarves, hats, and hair ribbons in order to draw that distinction as brightly as possible. Anthropologically speaking, this is a distinctly human behavior. A chimpanzee can tell a friend from a stranger, and bands of chimps will even engage in deadly battles over territory. But chimpanzees don't adorn themselves with leaves or flowers to distinguish themselves from others.
Humans, on the other hand, have been drawing that line for tens of thousands of years. In South Africa, archaeologists have found caches of snail shells dating back 75,000 years, each carefully drilled to be strung on a necklace. This early jewelry may well have served to identify people as part of a group, and as David Berreby '79 has written in his new book, Us and Them: Understanding Your Tribal Mind, we humans have a penchant for seeing ourselves this way. But we don't need to carry sandwich boards to show which side we're on. A slender ribbon can be enough.
At halftime, with Yale ahead 14-3 and seemingly cruising to its first win in five years, I decided to see what had become of the U-Haul party. It was supposed to be over, but the music still boomed, people still danced in dense packs, and some people were still trying to drink from two beer bottles at the same time. The divisions were subtler here. The Harvard and Yale shirts tended to be clustered together, but any bright dividing line was covered in the mud. The police were discreetly moving from truck to truck, slowly persuading the DJs that their playlists had come to an end.
Back at the Bowl, The Game charged on, as Harvard evened the score at 24-all near the end of the fourth quarter and sent the contest into overtime -- something that had never happened in the previous 121 Games. Then it went into double overtime, then triple overtime. As late afternoon shadows deepened and it seemed possible The Game would have to end in a tie -- the Bowl has no field lights -- Harvard's Matt Berg intercepted a pass, and three plays later, Harvard had a touchdown. I still feel a bit sad as I write this, which makes me think I understand a little more what The Game is about. Just don't ask me for fashion advice. ![]()
