| |
|
|
Inside the Blue Book
November
2002
The
Burden of Beasts
by
Jennifer L. Holley
HIST 442a: Humans
and Animals from Genesis to the Genome
Faculty: Bettyann Kevles, Lecturer in History
When
Bettyann Kevles wrote a weekly column about animal behavior for
the Los Angeles Times,
she was praised by both the Fund for Animals and the Foundation
for Biomedical Research. Gaining respect from both sides of the
animal rights debate is indicative of Kevles's goal in her course,
"Humans and Animals from Genesis to the Genome."
"I'm not there to pontificate,"
Kevles says. Rather, she explores how religious, philosophical,
and scientific attitudes have affected the human relationship with
non-human animals from antiquity to the present day. She starts
with Aristotle, who claimed that animals had no souls. Aristotle,
in turn, greatly influenced the theology of the Catholic Church,
especially its interpretation of the meaning of humans' "dominion"
over animals, as mentioned in Genesis.
| |
"Most
people eat meat, but most also believe that animals should
be treated kindly."
|
The course focuses on
a paradox epitomized by the experiences of Charles Darwin. As a
young man entering medical school, he saw how animals were being
used for experiments and was so appalled he left. However, towards
the end of his life, when asked to sign a petition against animal
experimentation, he wouldn't.
This paradox is still
alive and well today. "Most people eat meat," says Kevles. "But
most also believe that animals should be treated kindly -- until
they are slaughtered." In addition, many people support animals
being used for research -- as long as they are not used gratuitously.
To see how animal-human
relationships are still being negotiated, students write weekly
papers about animals in the news or popular culture. (This semester's
class will see films
of H.G.
Wells's The
Island of Dr. Moreau.) Kevles says, "How humans should deal
with animals is an issue that's been around for thousands of years,
and it will not rest." 
|
|