|
Details:
The Natalie Show
Summer
2002
by Bruce Fellman
Given
the dangers now associated with sexual activity,
parents of undergraduates are no doubt calmed by this aphorism:
"Sex kills, so come to Yale and live forever." But it turns out
that the University is no monastery.
"I have
some bad news," says Natalie Krinsky '04. "Your children talk about
sex all the time -- and they do more than talk."
Krinsky
should know.
Author
of a weekly column, "Sex
and the (Elm) City," that first appeared in the Yale Daily
News last October 26, her contributions to the paper's Friday
"Scene" section have become required reading for undergraduates.
The column is a romp through bedrooms and social situations in which
the writer, a red-haired history major with an irrepressible giggle,
tells all -- at least, about herself.
| |
"People
may have a tough time separating who I am from what I write."
|
Krinsky
names parts but not partners, actions but not other actors. Such
candor has not made the writer's mother exactly happy, and her father,
who often hears about his daughter's adventures from Wall Street
colleagues who read the YDN online, is "trying to be supportive,"
she says.
The writer
and her colleagues talk publicly about intimacies that in other
times would have been shared only with one's intimates. After a
column was published last December, the author discovered just how
many "intimates" she had. The subject was a discussion about how
to handle a matter of sexual etiquette (interested readers can see
the article at www.yaledailynews.com/article.asp?AID=17519),
and the response was a tidal wave. The story has generated over
250,000 "hits" from all corners of the World Wide Web -- far more
than anything in the YDN -- and Krinsky became "The Natalie
Show," a bonafide Yale phenomenon.
"I'm
really popular," she giggles. "I've become an icon on campus, and
I love it."
Well,
parts of it.
Krinsky's
fame may have resulted in a stream of people who want to confide
in her.
But confidantes are not boyfriends, who have tended to steer clear
for fear of winding up in the newspaper, and not all correspondents
are congratulatory.
In fact,
some of the response to her stories about undergraduate escapades
has been downright brutal. Krinsky has been told that she has set
the women's movement back 100 years and chastised for not paying
proper heed to the risks of pregnancy and sexually transmitted diseases.
And there
were attacks that were far more personal. These hurt. "My first
reaction was tears, and my second was, I'll never write this again
and put myself out in this way," she says. "But it was too late."
Krinsky
has since come to terms with something every published author learns
to deal with. "People may have a tough time separating who I am
from what I write, but the 'Natalie' in this column is a persona,"
she says. "It's not who I really am."
Still,
playing the part has been worthwhile. "It's sparked my interest
in a writing career," says Krinsky, whose work earned her a summer
job with Bloomberg News in New York City.
And she
plans to be back at the YDN next fall, covering the old turf
as well as, perhaps, something new. "Maybe this summer I'll fall
in love," she wrote in her last column. Fans anxiously await the
tale.
|