| |
Comment on this article
A Closer Look at Alcohol
Students
may not be drinking any more than they ever did, but a "new
temperance" in America is focusing more attention on the costs
to drinkers and those around them. What's a university to do?
May
2001
by Mark Alden Branch '86
In 1993,
many college students past and present were surprised to learn that
what they had considered a typical Saturday night was in fact "binge
drinking."That was the year the authors of Harvard's College
Alcohol Study defined that term as the consumption of five drinks
in a row for men or four drinks in a row for women—an unremarkable evening in many a Yale dorm room or fraternity house.
The new
attention being paid to "binge drinking" is part of an evolving
awareness of alcohol use among college students and its effects.
Just as the public health consequences of smoking and poor eating
habits are being examined more carefully, students and administrators
alike are less likely to take heavy drinking for granted.
| |
The drinking age
and the American late adolescent seem to be in eternal conflict.
|
"Binge
drinking in college is high, but it's always been high," says David
Musto '61MA, a professor of the history of medicine and of child
psychiatry who studies cultural attitudes about drugs and alcohol.
"What has happened is that attitudes have been changing." Musto
contends that a "new temperance movement" is sweeping the country.
"Overall, alcohol consumption has dropped by about 20 percent since
1980, most of that decline coming in distilled spirits," he says.
"Alcohol is not seen as part of a healthy lifestyle. After cigarettes,
alcohol is going to be the next big reform."
There
is plenty about college drinking that cries out for change. Researchers
have documented in recent years that students who engage in binge
drinking are far more likely to miss classes, injure themselves,
damage property, engage in unprotected sex, and get in trouble with
the police. And non-drinkers suffer, too, reporting higher incidence
of such second-hand effects as assault, unwanted sexual advances,
interrupted study or sleep, and damaged property.
Just
in this academic year, issues related to alcohol have arisen several
times on Yale's campus. New Haven police raided two fraternity parties
within a month in the fall, arresting seven people at the Sigma
Alpha Epsilon house in September and two at the Alpha Sigma Phi
house in October. In December, the varsity heavyweight crew's activities
were suspended during an investigation of a possible hazing incident
when a freshman team member ended up at University Health Services
after drinking too much. (The probe turned up evidence of underage
drinking, but not hazing.) Meanwhile, Yale officials said in December
that they would not take advantage of a new law that allows the
University to notify parents about alcohol- related rules violations
by their children.
Clearly,
alcohol is on a lot of people's minds, and there are any number
of ideas about how to change the habits of college students
and increase compliance with drinking laws. But administrators say
that Yale and other colleges cannot stop underage drinking; they
can only hope to check its excesses. The drinking age and the American
late adolescent seem to be in eternal conflict.
This
has perhaps always been true, but there was a time when this was
not seen as a problem at places like Yale. From the end of Prohibition
in 1933 until 1972, the legal drinking age in Connecticut was 21,
but Yale students and administrators—and local saloonkeepers—essentially ignored the law, and undergraduates were served in
bars and in the colleges with no questions asked. In 1972, as 18-year-olds
were being sent off to Vietnam, Connecticut joined a number of states
in lowering the legal age to 18.
But in
the early 1980s, as the group Mothers Against Drunk Driving became
a potent political force, the state raised its drinking age to 19,
then to 20, and then, by federal mandate, to 21 in 1984. The motive
was to reduce drunk-driving fatalities, and according to the National
Highway Traffic Safety Commission, the law saved more than 8,000
lives nationwide in its first ten years, a result that makes it
hard to argue for lowering the age again.
But at
Yale, where few undergraduates drive at all, the law meant simply
a reshuffling of the College's social scene. Unlike the old days,
the University and local bars could not turn a blind eye to underage
drinking in a climate where juries were holding those who serve
alcohol responsible for the actions of those who drink it. Keg-fueled
"SAC parties" and common-room happy hours had to go, and venerable
student watering holes such as Mory's
and Toad's Place had to start
asking for proof of age. Organized drinking on campus dwindled,
fraternities with off-campus
houses began to reappear, and drinking became a more private affair.
Today,
students describe a campus social scene where having a single cocktail,
glass of wine, or beer, is less common than an evening intended
to end in inebriation. One underage sophomore says the drinking
age works against the idea of moderate social drinking. "Alcohol
becomes something precious when you can't have it whenever you want,"
he says. "It's difficult to enjoy it in small amounts when it's
so restricted."
But others
dispute the idea that the drinking age has changed patterns of student
alcohol use, maintaining that students have always drunk to excess
but are now simply doing it in different locations. Students say
that much of their drinking takes place in their own suites, where
hard liquor is the norm, in established "party suites" such as Silliman's
Beach Club and Morse's Sexplex, and at off-campus keg parties thrown
by fraternities, singing groups, and other organizations.
While
wine in the dining hall and sherry at the master's house are now
off limits to underage students, the administration's policy
on student drinking hasn't changed all that much since the
old days. Relying on an interpretation of Connecticut law that
forbids only serving alcohol to a minor, the College's counselors,
deans, and masters
don't take extraordinary measures to prohibit underage students
from drinking in their rooms. "We believe that when people come
here they are mature enough to conduct themselves in a lawful way,"
says dean of student affairs Betty Trachtenberg, who keeps an eye
on campus drinking. "I think that, by and large, our attitude works."
Students
say the message they get from freshman counselors when they arrive
at Yale is, as one sophomore put it, "'We know you're going to drink,
so drink responsibly.' They have workshops on how to drink in a
controlled manner and how to take care of someone who's drunk too
much."
A statistic
that sometimes fuels fears about binge drinking is the increase
in the number of students who receive medical attention as a result
of alcohol. While Yale's University Health Services (UHS) will not
release statistics on the subject, other colleges have reported
that more students are showing up at infirmaries and hospitals after
a night of binging. But some argue that this is actually good news,
a sign that students are taking the risks of alcohol more seriously.
Fourteen
years ago, when sophomore Ted McGuire '89 died in his room of alcohol
poisoning after a night of heavy drinking with friends, the standard
operating procedure for dealing with a friend who had drunk himself
unconscious was to put him or her to bed with a bucket nearby. It
would not have dawned on most students that a companion in that
condition might need medical attention. But today, counselors and
deans make a point of emphasizing to new students that they should
not hesitate to take themselves or a friend to UHS if they think
they may have drunk a dangerous amount of alcohol. And since students
have in the past shown a reluctance to call an ambulance in such
situations (which can mean a $400 bill that must be explained to
Mom and Dad), the University has since 1997 offered to transport
students to UHS via the campus minibus service. "We offer a van
that will drive them over, no questions asked, and someone can watch
them all night," says Silliman College dean Hugh Flick. "So when
the 'transports' to UHS are up, I see it as a good sign. People
are transporting their friends, and more people are getting the
help they need."
But
should the University be going further to combat alcohol abuse and
underage drinking? One tool that has been made available
to administrators is the ability to contact a student's parents
if he or she commits an alcohol- or drug-related infraction. Last
summer, Congress amended the Family Educational Right to Privacy
Act—which forbids colleges from releasing information about a
student to parents or anyone else without the student's consent
—to allow such an exception. A study at Bowling Green State University
suggests that such notifications reduce repeat offenses, but Yale
has not taken advantage of the law. Last fall, Trachtenberg said
she planned to send letters to parents, but she changed her mind
because of fears that the threat of a letter home could discourage
students from seeking help in emergencies.
Instead,
the Dean's Office and the mental hygiene department of UHS have
focused their efforts on education. Lorraine Siggins, the chief
of mental hygiene at UHS, says that students often have much to
learn about how alcohol affects them. In talks to freshmen, at study
breaks in the colleges, in fraternities and sororities, and even
in sessions at the graduate and professional schools, Siggins and
her staff of psychiatrists, psychologists, and social workers give
a short course in the chemistry and the psychology of alcohol. "We
try to talk about informed decision- making and low-risk ways of
drinking," says Siggins. "We talk about the alcohol content of various
liquors, how eating affects the equation, what a dangerous blood-alcohol
level is, what are circumstances under which they tend to drink
too much, and the fact that women metabolize alcohol more slowly."
When students are taken or take themselves to UHS, they routinely
are given an appointment at mental hygiene to discuss the episode
and ways they might avoid problems in the future.
While
Siggins would not speculate on whether there is more drinking—or more dangerous drinking—on campus now than in the past, she
does believe that there is increased awareness on campus about alcohol.
Some of that new awareness is the work of the College Alcohol Study
(CAS), the ongoing project at Harvard's School of Public Health
whose findings on "binge drinking" have been highly publicized.
Henry Wechsler, who heads the CAS, says he developed his definition
of binge drinking based on the amount of alcohol it takes "to put
the drinker and others at risk." CAS's research shows that men who
have five drinks in a row or women who have four have an increased
risk of commiting vandalism, getting in fights, driving drunk, injuring
themselves, or getting into trouble with the police. "The standard
represents a danger signal, a warning of negative health, social, economic, and legal consequences ahead," says Wechsler. The CAS
has surveyed college students throughout the 1990s and has found
that binge drinking has "stayed high," according to Wechsler. As
for possible solutions to the high binge- drinking rate, Wechsler
says CAS studies have found that students in "substance-free" dormitories
drink less, and that raising prices and limiting availability could
help.
H.
Wesley Perkins '79PhD, a professor of sociology at Hobart and William
Smith Colleges, could not disagree more. "Traditional strategies
have not changed behavior one percent," says Perkins. Instead of
focusing on education about alcohol's consequences—"scaring the
health into people," he calls it—or cracking down on the sources
of supply, Perkins advocates a new tactic called a "social
norms model" of alcohol education. The social norms model is
based on research by Perkins and others that shows that college
students consistently overestimate how much their classmates drink.
Such misperceptions, Perkins says, affect their own decisions about
how much it is acceptable to drink. Perkins encourages colleges
to publicize around campus its statistics on drinking. "Our strategy
is to tell the truth about peer norms, rather than moralizing and
telling them what to do," he says. "Most students have responsible
attitudes but don't realize that their attitudes are normative."
The results
have been striking on Perkins's home campus, where messages about
peer norms have been appearing in print and electronic media for
five years now. In the first 18 months of the campaign, the number
of students who engaged in frequent heavy drinking at Hobart and
William Smith went down 21 percent—a figure Perkins says is remarkable,
considering that the rate of heavy drinking among college students
nationally has not changed more than one percent in the last 15
years. Other campuses, such as Arizona and Northern Illinois, have experienced similar drops after adopting the approach.
What's
more, Perkins says the campaign has resulted in even sharper drops
in the consequences of drinking, including property damage, missed
classes, unprotected sex, and memory loss. "We think this is because
the social norms model has a sharper effect on the heaviest drinkers,"
says Perkins. "Those who are moderate drinkers back off a little
bit. But the most permissive change their behavior more dramatically."
Lorraine
Siggins says that social-norms education is one part of her department's
approach. "We've been doing some of that," she says. "Students always
perceive that others are drinking more than they really are." But
Wechsler is skeptical about trying to suggest that alcohol use on
campus is less of a problem than people might think. "I don't know
of any public health problem that has been solved by playing it
down," he says.
Skeptics
surely will say that nothing will stop the inevitable, age-old undergraduate
penchant for testing limits with alcohol. Even Wechsler notes
that the relationship between college and the bottle was described
by Thomas Jefferson as an undergraduate at William and Mary. Still,
reformers have a precedent in tobacco that gives them cause for
optimism. Only a generation ago, smoking was a ubiquitous habit,
practiced with impunity almost anywhere on campus. Now, it is the exception rather than the rule. Already, abstaining from alcohol
seems to be a more common and acceptable stance for an undergraduate,
and in the larger popular culture, drunkenness is less a staple
of film and television comedy. At Yale, even Mory's now offers a
non-alcoholic version of its famous "cups." If alcohol seems to
be a bigger problem on campus than it used to be, the reason may
be that people are coming to the conclusion that what used to be
just having a good time is no longer acceptable.  |
|
