Comment on this article
The story behind the Geronimo lawsuit
Ramsey Clark, Prescott Bush, Skull and Bones, and the Apache
February 19, 2009
by Carole Bass '83, '97MSL
Harlyn Geronimo, great-grandson of Geronimo, and 19
relatives have filed suit for return of
Geronimo's remains. Their lawyer is Ramsey Clark, an 81-year-old former U.S.
attorney general who has earned his own share of notoriety by representing
accused Serbian war criminals and Saddam Hussein, among others. Clark filed the
suit in U.S. District Court in Washington, DC, on February 17, the 100th anniversary of Geronimo's death.
A 1918 letter [PDF] published in the Yale Alumni
Magazine in 2006 shows that Skull and Bones
members at the time believed they had Geronimo's skull. Some experts contend
the marauders had the wrong grave. But the letter
refutes the claim made by Bonesmen in more recent years that the story of the
grave robbery at Fort Sill -- widely circulated for two decades -- was a hoax. Other
reports have identified Prescott Bush '17, father and grandfather of the former
U.S. presidents, as one of the thieves.
| |
"The spirit is just wandering until a proper burial."
|
The legal complaint lays out a 22-page capsule history of
Geronimo's life and legacy. Born around 1829 in New Mexico, Geronimo spent
decades fighting U.S. and Mexican troops and white settlers after his mother,
wife, and three young children were murdered. He finally surrendered to the
U.S. Army in 1886 and remained a prisoner of war until he died of pneumonia at
around age 79. His grave at Fort Sill is still a major tourist site, Clark
says.
In the mid-1980s, the chairman of the San Carlos Apache
Tribe in Arizona was campaigning to have Geronimo's remains moved to that
state. When he received an anonymous letter from a purported Bones member, with
a photo of a skull -- claimed to be Geronimo's -- in a display case, the
grave-robbing story went national. But the San Carlos tribal chairman met
frustration in his efforts to get the skull, or even a straight story, from
Skull and Bones.
Harlyn Geronimo and his kin bringing the lawsuit are a
separate group of Apaches, who live on the Mescalero Apache reservation in New
Mexico. Clark says he hasn't personally tried to contact Skull and Bones about
the relics, but that his clients "probably have."
"If there's anything that's true from the literature,"
Clark notes, "people who tried to pursue it got the runaround" from Skull
and Bones.
At a Washington, DC, press conference announcing the lawsuit,
Harlyn Geronimo cast it as not only a legal matter, but also a spiritual one:
"If remains are not properly buried, the spirit is just wandering,
wandering, until a proper burial has been performed."
But the legal issues may be murky. The Washington Post quotes Towana Spivey, "a Geronimo expert, a Chickasaw, and director of the Fort Sill National
Historic Landmark Museum," as declaring that it's not the Army but the Fort
Sill Apaches who decide whether a body remains in the cemetery there.
Furthermore, the chairman of the Fort Sill Apaches told the Post that "it would be inappropriate to desecrate
Geronimo's grave and remove him."
"We disagree" that the Fort Sill Apaches have
control," Clark responds. "We think it's on Army land and it's Fort Sill
that has control."
He also asserts that Yale has responsibility for the actions of Skull and
Bones.
"They must be a landlord," he says. Told that in fact the
society owns the "Tomb," its clubhouse, Clark responds: "There must be some
regulatory power that Yale has over its students, at least. And Yale
University, as an institution of higher learning, has some moral obligation.
It's their students and their alumni."
Asked about the rumors surrounding one of those famous
alumni, Prescott Bush, he replies: "I don't know what to make of it. I
knew him as a senator, and he was a very distinguished man. But kids do
things." 
|